Internal modelRecruit viewHub DirectorComparisons

Model Comparisons

Side-by-side financial comparison of the KW model against competitor brands.

KW vs IAD — crossover point

At a KW MC cap of £18,000, from £85,500 of annual GCI onwards the KW agent takes home more than the IAD agent (steady-state year, excluding IAD's Year-1 first-5-deals boost). Below this level IAD's 79% tier wins; above it, KW's 98% post-cap pulls ahead.

Agent assumptions

Shared input — the same agent GCI is applied to both brands so the comparison is like-for-like.

£
£
KW agent take-home
£72,447
Effective split 74.7% before desk fees · 72.4% after. Capped this year.
IAD agent take-home
£73,460
Effective split 75.3% before monthly fees · 20.0 deals · hit 87.8% cap
Difference
-£1,013
IAD agent keeps more at this GCI level
KW company earnings
£25,553
35% of GCI pre-cap (27% MC + 8% KWW, growth share excluded) +£2,220 desk/tech fees.
IAD company earnings
£26,540
Split retained + £1,800 monthly fees.
Difference (we vs them)
-£987
IAD earns more per agent at this GCI level.
Agent take-home vs annual GCI

Where the lines cross is the GCI level at which one brand starts paying the agent more than the other.

£-2k£31k£64k£98k£131k£0k£60k£120k£150kKW agent take-homeIAD agent take-home
5-year projection

Same annual GCI repeated each year. IAD's 79% first-tier applies only to the agent's first 5 lifetime deals — so it shows up in Year 1 only and is gone from Year 2 onwards. KW's cap and splits reset annually as normal.

KW total (5y)
£362,233
IAD total (5y)
£357,300
Difference
+£4,933
£0k£98k£196k£293k£391kY1Y5KW cumulative take-homeIAD cumulative take-home
YearGCIKW take-homeIAD take-homeDifferenceKW co. earnsIAD co. earnsCo. diff
Year 1 (incl. IAD tier-1)£72,447£73,460-£1,013£25,553£26,540-£987
Year 2£72,447£70,960+£1,487£25,553£29,040-£3,487
Year 3£72,447£70,960+£1,487£25,553£29,040-£3,487
Year 4£72,447£70,960+£1,487£25,553£29,040-£3,487
Year 5£72,447£70,960+£1,487£25,553£29,040-£3,487
Total£500,000£362,233£357,300+£4,933£127,767£142,700-£14,933
KW breakdown
GCI£100,000
KW split + post-cap£25,333
Desk / tech fees (12 mo)£2,220
Agent net£72,447
%
%
%
£
%
£

Pre-cap: agent keeps 63% (27% MC + 8% KWW + 2% growth share = 37% company). Cap is measured on the MC portion only — agent caps after £66,667 of GCI (£18,000 ÷ 27%), then keeps 98% of every £ for the rest of the year.

IAD breakdown
TierGCIAgent keeps
First 5 deals @ 79%£25,000£19,750
Standard @ 69% (to £80k)£55,000£37,950
Capped @ 87.8%£20,000£17,560
Monthly fees (12 mo)£1,800
Agent net£100,000£73,460
%
%
%
£
£
Advantages & disadvantages

Keller Williams

Pros

  • Hard MC cap (£18k of MC fees) — high producers keep 98% for the rest of the year.
  • Post-cap rate (98%) beats IAD's 87.8% ceiling.
  • Lead-agent override, GCI bonus and uncapped 1% rev-share build team-owner income (separate model).
  • Office, training, KWConnect and brand infrastructure included.

Cons

  • Lower split until capped — agent keeps 63% on the first £66,667 of GCI.
  • Fixed monthly desk / tech fee regardless of production.
  • Slow starters effectively pay full freight.

IAD

Pros

  • Very high entry split (79%) on the first 5 deals — strong for new agents.
  • No fixed monthly desk fee.
  • Self-employed / remote model with network overrides.

Cons

  • Drops to 69% after 5 deals — a real cliff mid-year.
  • Top tier (87.8%) only unlocks after £80k of personal fees — most agents never reach it.
  • Fixed monthly fee of £125+VAT regardless of production.
  • No office, no shared brand pipeline, no structured caps protecting high producers.
  • Effective split plateaus below KW's post-cap 98%.
KW vs eXp UK — crossover point

At a KW MC cap of £18,000, KW does not overtake eXp within £200k of annual GCI. Lower the cap in the KW breakdown below to bring the crossover into range.

Agent assumptions

Shared input — the same agent GCI is applied to both brands so the comparison is like-for-like.

£
KW agent take-home
£72,447
Effective split 72.4% after desk fees · Capped
eXp UK agent take-home
£74,500
Effective split 74.5% after fees · hit 100% cap
Difference
-£2,053
eXp agent keeps more at this GCI level
KW company earnings
£25,553
35% of GCI pre-cap (27% MC + 8% KWW, growth share excluded) +£2,220 desk/tech fees.
eXp company earnings
£25,500
Split retained + £1,500 monthly fees.
Difference (we vs them)
+£53
KW earns more per agent at this GCI level.
Agent take-home vs annual GCI

Where the lines cross is the GCI level at which one brand starts paying the agent more than the other.

£-2k£32k£66k£100k£134k£0k£60k£120k£150kKW agent take-homeeXp UK agent take-home
5-year projection

Both brands' caps reset annually. Edit GCI per year to model a scaling agent.

KW total (5y)
£362,233
eXp total (5y)
£372,500
Difference
-£10,267
£0k£101k£201k£302k£402kY1Y5KW cumulative take-homeeXp cumulative take-home
YearGCIKW take-homeeXp take-homeDifferenceKW co. earnseXp co. earnsCo. diff
Year 1£72,447£74,500-£2,053£25,553£25,500+£53
Year 2£72,447£74,500-£2,053£25,553£25,500+£53
Year 3£72,447£74,500-£2,053£25,553£25,500+£53
Year 4£72,447£74,500-£2,053£25,553£25,500+£53
Year 5£72,447£74,500-£2,053£25,553£25,500+£53
Total£500,000£362,233£372,500-£10,267£127,767£127,500+£267
KW breakdown
GCI£100,000
KW split + post-cap£25,333
Desk / tech fees (12 mo)£2,220
Agent net£72,447
%
%
%
£
%
£
eXp UK breakdown
TierGCIAgent keeps
Pre-cap @ 70%£80,000£56,000
Post-cap @ 100%£20,000£20,000
Monthly fees (12 mo)£1,500
Agent net£100,000£74,500
%
%
£
£

Agent caps after £80,000 of GCI (£24,000 ÷ 30%), then keeps 100% for the rest of the year. Cap resets annually.